|
|
|
RATIONALE
In line with the government’s policies on decentralization and administrative
delegation, Regional Development Councils (RDCs) were reorganized and
strengthened through Executive Order (EO) No. 308, which among others,
tasked the RDCs with the coordination of project implementation, monitoring
and evaluation. Moreover, Memorandum Order (MO) No. 175 was issued on 25 may
1988 which created Project Monitoring Committees at the provincial / city
and municipal levels to monitor local government projects funded from
national government and local government funds.
In support of these policies and to facilitate project implementation,
monitoring and evaluation at the regional and sub-regional levels, a
Regional Project Monitoring and Evaluation System (RPMES) was established
through EO 376 dated 2 November 1989. The system provides a scheme for
monitoring and evaluating projects at the national, regional, provincial /
city and municipal levels, with the extensive and active participation of
various government agencies, local government units and non-government
organizations (NGOs) at all levels.
Through the system, generation of information on the overall status of project
implementation at each level and the detection of problems that impede
implementation will be facilitated, so that remedial actions can be readily
undertaken at the nearest the project sites, and at the earliest time
possible.
This manual has been developed primarily for the Project Monitoring Committees
at the regional / provincial / city / municipal levels responsible for the
monitoring and evaluation of programs / projects under their jurisdiction.
It provides the basic framework for monitoring and evaluating projects at
all levels, the general process flow, responsibilities of units involved,
the input and output forms, and the procedures for filling up the forms.
Decision parameters are also included for specific / common implementation
problems. Expansion of the system to include additional data inputs and
output reports will depend upon the various development councils at the
regional, provincial, city or municipal levels. The reports suggested in the
manual are the minimum required to provide basic information that will
enable consolidation of information on implementation status of development
projects necessary to evaluate performance and resolve implementation
problems at all levels.
With the passage of Republic Act (RA) 7160, otherwise known as the Local
Government Code of 1991, monitoring of projects has been devolved to the
local government units. However, there remains a need for the coordination
of project implementation, monitoring and evaluation both at the regional
and national levels. Thus, a need for updating the Manual of Operations for
the Project Monitoring Committees at all levels to make it consistent with
the devolution of monitoring functions to the local government units
pursuant to the Code. The National Project Monitoring Committee was
established pursuant to EO 93 which amends EO 376 to coordinate various
RPMES matters nationwide. EO 93 also mandates the NPMC to update and make
revision on the manual as necessary.
OBJECTIVES
The RPMES primarily aims to facilitate project implementation, and devolve
project facilitation, problem-solving, monitoring and evaluation to the
regional, provincial/city and municipal levels. Specifically, the
system aims to achieve the following objectives:
-
to provide a system for
the integration, coordination and linkage of all monitoring activities in
the region;
-
to provide up-to-date
information on the over-all status of project implementation at each level
for planning and budget allocation, to include employment generation of
the various programs/projects expressed in man-days;
-
to identify
problems/issues which impede project implementation for remedial actions
at the regional and sub-regional levels and to elevate unresolved issues
and problems at these levels to the Cabinet or the President for
resolution and final action through the NMPC, CORD or Presidential
Assistants (Pas) as appropriate;
-
to provide information
on lessons learned in project implementation for planning and
implementation of future similar projects;
-
to assess and ascertain
whether projects implemented are supportive of regional development goals
and plans as well as national development thrusts and priorities; and,
-
to provide a venue for
greater participation of non-government organizations (NGOs) in the
development planning process.
SCOPE
AND COVERAGE
Monitoring and evaluation under the RPMES will cover all development projects
undertaken by Government Agencies (GAs), Local Government Units (LGUs),
State Universities and Colleges (SUCs), and Government-Owned and Controlled
Corporations (GOCCs) at the regional, provincial/city and municipal levels
during the fiscal year, inclusive of backlogs from previous fiscal years.
Development projects include: (a) projects which are capital-forming and
contributing directly to the country's productive capacity; (b)
pre-investment studies, research and development, and institutional
development activities; and (c) "pro-poor" and other similar projects under
direction and special programs of the President through Presidential
Management Staff (PMS) and other Cabinet offices. These projects may be
funded by the National Government with or without foreign assistance, or
financed purely from local revenues of LGUs. Projects to be covered, in more
specific terms include the following:
-
those under the General Appropriations Act for the current fiscal year;
-
those which comprise the approved National Infrastructure Program;
-
those undertaken by government-owned and controlled corporations, with or
without subsidy or equity contribution from the national government; and
-
those implemented by local government units, with or without budgetary
assistance from the national government, specifically including those
funded from the 20 percent of the internal revenue allotment share
appropriated for development projects.
National Level:
The National Project Monitoring Committee will monitor all development
projects undertaken by government agencies, LGUs, SCUs and GOCCs and prepare
consolidated reports based on monitoring outputs of the Regional Project
Monitoring Committees.
Regional Level:
Projects that will be monitored and evaluated at the regional level include:
-
all foreign-assisted projects (loan or grant funded);
-
inter-provincial projects implemented in two or more provinces in the
region;
-
all area development projects; and
-
nationally-funded projects implemented in the region and other projects
considered critical by the Office of the President, regional development
councils/planning board.
Provincial City Level:
At the provincial/city level, the scope of monitoring will include projects
implemented and managed at these levels and projects classified under any of
the following:
-
foreign and nationally-funded projects, which are implemented or located
in two or several municipalities in the province (provincial projects
and/or inter-municipal projects) or implemented or located in the city;
-
other projects implemented and managed at the provincial I city level with
funding generated from provincial/city sources.
Municipal Level:
At the municipal level, the scope of monitoring will include projects
implemented and managed at these levels and projects classified under any of
the following:
-
foreign and nationally-funded projects, which are implemented or located
in the municipality;
-
other projects implemented and managed at the municipal level with funding
generated from local sources.
ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK
The operationalization of the RPMES will be undertaken by a number of
units/entities acting as coordinators, monitors, and project implementers.
Coordination Activities
To ensure that the RPMES activities are coordinated in terms of information
dissemination, submission of reports, monitoring and evaluation of project
implementation, feedback and problem-solving; coordinative mechanism of the
system will be provided at the various levels. The NEDA Board through the
NPMC will oversee the implementation of the RPMES at all levels.
Coordination of PMC activities at the sub-national levels will be the
responsibility of the various development councils. Region-wide and
inter-regional coordination will be handled by the Regional Development
Councils (RDCs), the Metropolitan Manila Authority, Regional Planning and
Development Board of ARMM, Cordillera Executive Board of CAR and other
similar bodies which may be established.
Coordination at the provincial and municipal levels will be undertaken by
the Provincial Development Councils, City Development Councils and the
Municipal Development Councils.
Planning, Programming, Scheduling, and Monitoring Activities
Operationalization of the RPMES will be undertaken by the NPMC through the
Project Monitoring Committees (PMCs) created in each region through EO 376
and EO 93 in each province, city and municipality as mandated by RA
7160(LGC). These PMCs will be responsible for planning, programming and
scheduling monitoring activities and for monitoring and evaluating the
implementation of development projects at their respective levels.
The RPMES provides for the extensive and active participation of NGOs,
private volunteer organizations (PVOs) and concerned citizens as authorized
monitors at all levels.
Project Implementation Activities
The implementation of development projects at various levels will be
undertaken by regular government agencies, non-official government-owned or
controlled corporations, and local government units. They will provide
monitors with their respective annual work and financial plans, and status
reports on project implementation.
|
 |
ORGANIZATION OF PROJECT MONITORING COMMITTEES
Membership
The Project Monitoring Committees (PMCs) established in each region through EO
376 and in each province, city and municipality through MO 175, as amended
will be composed of the following:
National PMC:
NEDA Deputy Director-General –
Chairman
DBM Undersecretary
– Co-chairman
PMS-OP Head
– Member
DILG Undersecretary
– Member
A technical working group among NEDA, DBM, DILG, and PMS-OP will be
created. The NEDA will serve as the Secretariat of the NPMC.
Regional PMC:
NEDA Regional Director
– Chairman
DBM Regional Director
– Co-chairman
DILG Regional Director
– Member
PMS-OP Regional Team Leader –
Member
One RDC-NGO representative
– Member
Two NGO representatives
– Members
The NEDA Regional Office will serve as the Secretariat of the RPMC.
Provincial/City/Municipal PMC:
The composition of the local PMCs will be left to the discretion of the Local
Development Council subject to inclusion of the following as mandatory
members of the PMC:
-
DILG Representative or Provincial/City/Local Government Officer assigned
in the area
-
One Representative of NGO/PO
-
One Representative of NGO members in the Local Development Council
Creation of PMCS
Region
The RPMC Chairman, Co-Chairman and the RPMC members, shall
initiate the creation of the PMC by calling for an organizational meeting to
be attended by RDC-NGO members and NGO representatives, to discuss the
objectives and functions of the RPMC.
In the said meeting, the NGO representatives shall recommend the persons who
will be nominated to the RPMC. The RDC-NGO members shall submit the name of
their nominees to the RDC Chairman and Co-chairman, thru the RPMC Chairman
copy furnished the RPMC Co-chairman, for selection and appointment of the
NGO members to the RPMC.
Province/City/Municipality
The Provincial/City/Municipal Development Council shall initiate the creation
of the PMC by deciding on its composition and procedure for appointing
members of the PMC and calling an organizational meeting to be attended by
those concerned (PMC Chairman members) to discuss the objectives and
functions of the PMC.
In the said meeting, the NGO representatives shall recommend nominees to the
PMC who shall sit as LDC-NGO members. The PMC Chairman shall then submit the
names of these NGO nominees to the Local Development Council for selection
and appointment.
Selection and Appointment of NGO Representatives
Regional
The selection and appointment of NGO representatives to the Regional PMCs
will be guided by a set of criteria prescribed under Section 4.2 of the
DBM-NEDA Joint Circular 1-90, as amended.
-
the NGO representatives
of the Regional Development Council shall nominate all the NGO
representatives to the PMC. All NGO nominees must meet the following basic
qualifications:
·
must be a Filipino citizen;
·
must be a good member in good standing of a
civic, religious, or any other NGO preferably with chapters or extensions in
all provinces and cities in the region; and
·
must be nominated by the NGO member of the RDC.
-
all nominations shall
be submitted to the RDC Chairman and Co-chairman, thru the RPMC Chairman
and Co-chairman for selection and appointment. Nominations must be
accompanied by the bio-data of each nominee and certification of
membership in good standing of the NGO with which the nominee is
affiliated with.
-
the RDC Chairman and
Co-chairman, from among the nominees of the NGO members of the RDC shall
select and appoint the NGO members to the PMC following the qualification
guidelines.
-
the term of appointment
of NGO member to the PMC shall be one year without prejudice to
reappointment or a maximum of three (3) years membership in the PMC. The
appointment may be terminated at any time through the joint signatures of
the RDC Chairman and Co-chairman.
-
an appointment may be
made to fill up the un-expired term of an NGO member whose services has
been terminated.
-
the NGO member of the
Regional PMC shall be entitled to an honorarium at the same rate as that
of the regular RDC-NGO members allowed under MO NO. 195, dated 24 October
1988.
Province/City/Municipality
Provincial/City/Municipal PMCs, on the other hand , will be guided by a set
of criteria stipulated under Section 4.2 of the DBM-DOF Joint Circular 2-88
dated 3 October 1988 as amended.
-
the NGO representatives
of the Local Development Council shall nominate the NGO/PO representatives
to the PMC. All NGO/PO nominees must met the following basic
qualifications:
·
must be a member in good standing of a civic,
religious or any other non government organization located in the
province/city/municipality concerned;
·
must be a Filipino citizen;
·
must not be related by affinity or consanguinity
up to the fourth degree to the Chief Local Executive concerned; and
·
must be nominated by the NGO/PO members of the
Local Development Council.
-
the Local Chief
Executive shall appoint the NGO/PO nominees.
-
the term of appointment
of the NGO/PO member to the PMC shall be one year without prejudice to
reappointment. The term of appointment may be terminated at any time by
the joint signatures of the LDC Chairman and Co-chairman.
-
an appointment may be
extended to fill up the un-expired term of a member whose service is
terminated.
-
the NGO/PO member of
the provincial/city/municipal PMC shall e entitled to incentives or
honorarium at rates determined by RPMC, the granting of which will be tied
to reporting of status of projects to RPMC including participation in M&E
activities.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF ENTITIES
The specific roles and responsibilities of the various units/organizations
involved in implementation of the monitoring and evaluation system are as
follows:
National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA)
-
provides overall direction and coordination of RPMES activities;
-
provides feedback to Regional PMCs on actions made on issues raised to the
Cabinet or the President;
-
provides the secretariat services as indicated; and
-
conducts training jointly with DBM and DILG for the operationalization of
the RPMES, together with other members of the NPMC.
Department of Budget and Management (DBM)
-
provides the PMCs with information on project fund releases;
-
ensures that the national PMC Secretariat is provided with copies of all
Advices of Allotment issued, whether comprehensively released at the start
of the fiscal year, or as directed by law as in the case of certain
special purpose funds which require the fulfillment of certain
preconditions for release;
-
evaluates and reports on the budget performance of implementing agencies;
and
-
facilitates timely releases of RPMES funds for monitoring activities at
the national and regional levels.
Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG)
-
ensures expanded scope of monitoring and evaluation to include other
development projects specified under EO 376 as amended; and
-
assists NEDA and other members of the NPMC in the conduct of training for
the operationalization of RPMES
Presidential Management Staff - Office of the President (PMS-OP)
-
includes in the agenda of the CORD-RDC Chair meeting with the President or
other appropriate venue, issues or problems raised through RPMES that
require action of the Cabinet/President
-
follows up with the cabinet members/agency heads actions or
recommendations to expedite project implementation; and
-
provides feedback to concerned CORD-RDC chairman on problems/issues raised
for discussion.
Development Councils (RDC, PDC, CDC, MDC)
-
supervise and coordinate activities of the PMCs;
-
assess problems encountered in project implementation and provide remedial
action possible at their levels or refer problems/issues to appropriate
units or next higher development council;
-
evaluate the implementation of projects and derive lessons for future
planning and project implementation;
-
provide policy direction in planning and budget allocation based on the
overall status of project implementation;
-
report on the status of project implementation to appropriate bodies
(President, Cabinet, Congress, etc.) for information or action;
-
inform PMCs of action taken on problems referred to appropriate units
(i.e., Cabinet, OP); and
-
disseminate information to the media, general public the status of project
implementation in the respective areas of coverage.
Local Government Units
-
provide the RDC, thru the Regional PMC Secretariat, the monitoring reports
of the Provincial, City and Municipal Project Monitoring Committees; and
-
establish local PMCs and provide needed resources for their operation and
maintenance.
National Project Monitoring Committee (NPMC)
-
coordinates and oversees implementation of RPMES at the national level and
issues directions/instructions for efficient operation of system;
-
formulates policies, strategies and guidelines for the effective conduct
of M&E activities at the regional, provincial, city and municipal level
(data gathering, report preparation, problem-solving);
-
maintains up-to-date information on foreign-assisted projects and national
development projects and prepares quarterly reports on priority programs
and projects to the President, legislature, and the general public;
-
conducts problem-solving sessions, monitor implementation of
recommendation and conduct field monitoring visits on selected projects;
and
-
develops and maintains an information system to facilitate reporting from
regional PMCs, and generation of reports.
Project Monitoring Committees (RPMC, PPMC, CPMC, MPMC)
-
provide list and schedule of all projects to be monitored to NGOs involved
in project monitoring;
-
collect and process reports of implementors and NGO monitors on the status
of project implementation for the information of the development council
and next higher level project monitoring committee;
-
pinpoint problems and verify information to be submitted for analysis and
action of the development councils;
-
provide feedback on the remedial actions of the development council and
follow up their implementation;
-
prepare and disseminate periodic project monitoring report on the status
of project implementation; and
-
elevate to higher level bodies problems/issues which are not resolved at
their level.
PMC Secretariat (National Level)
-
recommends to NPMC policies, strategies and guidelines for the effective
conduct of monitoring and evaluation activities at the national, regional
and local levels;
-
provides such assistance as may be required by the NPMC such as in the
coordination of the implementation of the RPMES at the national, regional
and local levels;
-
provides feedback to regional PMCs on actions taken on issues raised at
the national level;
-
disseminates information on nationally-funded regional/local projects to
the RPMCs;
-
monitors and reports on interregional and nationwide projects and
undertake facilitative actions on problems encountered;
-
develops and maintains up-to-date information system in support of RPMES;
and
-
provides administrative support to the NPMC.
PMC Secretariat (Regional Level)
-
prepares a Work and Financial Plan to cover the activities of the regional
PMCs which shall be endorsed by the RDC Chairman. The WFP will be the
basis for the allocation of funds for the operating requirements of RPMCs;
-
prepares the monitoring program to be undertaken by the PMCs during any
given fiscal year, which will include, among others, the list of projects
and schedule of implementation based on submission of implementing
agencies; and
-
facilitates interagency, intergovernmental and field headquarters
coordination, whenever necessary.
PMC Secretariats (Provincial,Cty, Municipal)
-
prepare the monitoring program to be undertaken by the PMCs during any
given fiscal year, which will include, among others, the list of projects
and schedule of implementation based on submission of implementing
agencies;
-
provide provincial/city/municipal chief executives with information on the
projects to be monitored by the local PMCs; and
-
facilitate interagency, intergovernmental and field headquarters
coordination, whenever necessary.
Project Implementors (regular government agencies, non-financial
government-owned or controlled corporations, state colleges and universities
and local government units)
National Level
-
furnish copies of the Agency Work and Financial Plans to the National PMC
Secretariat, thru the NEDA Project Monitoring Staff (NEDA-PMS) not later
than two weeks after approval by DBM.
The Departments of Public Works and Highways and
Transportation and Communications, in particular, will provide the
national PMC Secretariat, thru the NEDA-PMS, copies of the National
Infrastructure Program for the regions within two weeks after approval by
the President. For GOCCs, copies of approved projects for the calendar
year should be submitted to the National PMC Secretariat.
Regional, Provincial, City, Municipal Levels
-
submit periodic reports to the monitoring committee on the status of
project implementation based on suggested reporting forms;
-
provide authorized monitors (PMC Members) assistance in getting access to
more detailed information on project implementation (e.g. detailed work
program);
-
submit to next higher level office of line agency reports on status of
project implementation; and
-
implement/institute remedial measures on problems/issues identified as
suggested by the development council.
NGO-Authorized Monitors
-
assist the project monitoring committee or development council in
monitoring and evaluation of projects by identifying implementation
problems or outstanding performance through project exception reports;
-
ensure effective/efficient implementation of projects through vigilance;
and
-
act as government partners in ensuring transparency in project
implementation.
SYSTEMS
FRAMEWORK
The underlying principle of the monitoring and evaluation system framework
is its usefulness in enhancing the efficiency of project implementation at
the various levels. Hence, the monitoring and evaluation system is primarily
for the purpose of expediting project implementation at that level and to
determine whether the objectives of the projects are accomplished. Providing
the next higher level development council with reports on the status of
project implementation is only a secondary function.
The overall framework for monitoring projects at each level under the RPMES
likewise traces the reporting, feedback and referral flows within and among
the various levels of monitoring and evaluation – national, regional,
provincial/city, and municipal levels.
For each level, the linkages among the project implementers as the basic
source of project information, the Project Monitoring Committees as
coordinators/monitors, authorized non-government organizations as project
monitors, and development councils at various levels as decision-making and
problem-solving bodies are traced.
PROCESS FLOW
General
The monitoring and evaluation process starts with the planning, programming
and scheduling of monitoring activities to be under taken by the respective
PMCs for the year. The following documents will be prepared:
-
Work and Financial Plan
(WFP) to
cover the activities of the regional and provincial, city, municipal PMCs
during the calendar year. The WFP will be prepared by each Regional PMC
following the guidelines set by the DBM as basis for the allocation of
funds for the operating requirements of the regional PMCs. The WFP
endorsed by the RDC Chairman should be coursed through the DBM Regional
Office for evaluation and endorsement to the DBM Central Office for
approval.
-
Monitoring Plan
(MP) which shall include, among others, the list of projects to be covered
by the RPMES during the year, and the corresponding schedules of
implementation. The monitoring plan will be prepared by PMC Secretariats
at the national and regional levels based on the submission of
implementing agencies. The scope of monitoring at each level will be
guided by the guidelines set in Section 2.2 of this manual.
-
Monitoring Work Program
(MWP) which shall serve as operational checklist on the sequential
activities required to achieve the objectives of the monitoring and the
evaluation. The MWP shall contain adequate information and shall specify
particular projects to be inspected, responsibilities, timetables,
performance standards and targets, budgets, etc. It will be prepared by
the PMCs at the regional level based on the monitoring plans prepared by
the PMC Secretariats, and the initial reports and Work and Financial Plans
from implementing agencies. The MWP will be distributed to all units
involved in the RPMES.
Once the projects are in motion, monitoring and evaluation of the performance
of projects will be undertaken. Project monitoring inputs will come from
project implementers and NGOs, and submitted to the Project Monitoring
Committees for processing and consolidation. Where verification or
validation of reports are needed, project visits will be conducted by the
PMCs.
The consolidated reports will be submitted to the development councils for
information and evaluation. Problems encountered in project implementation
will be assessed to determine the remedial actions that can be undertaken at
their level. The discussion of the project implementation issues will be
included in the agenda of the development councils meeting. It will take the
form of a problem-solving session with concerned implementing agencies
attending. If the problems/issues cannot be resolved at their level, these
issues will be elevated to the higher level Development Council (e.g.,
issues that cannot be resolved at the municipal level will be elevated to
the provincial level, or directly from the municipal level to the regional
level for problems that require RDC action).
Project Monitoring Committees will likewise submit regular consolidated
reports to the next higher level PMC, but these will only serve as secondary
sources of data on project implementation. The primary sources of data will
still be the project implementers and NGOs at the same level as the PMC.
Consolidation and submission of reports at the municipal, city and
provincial levels will be done on a monthly basis, quarterly for the
regional level.
The output reports prepared at the regional level will be submitted to the
RPMES National Secretariat, copy furnished the DBM, for
integration/consolidation. The consolidated report will then be used as
input during the Problem-Solving Sessions (PSS) of the CORD-RDCC meeting,
with the President or the Presidential Assistants or NPMC with the regions.
National Level
-
All national government
agencies will furnish copies of their Work and Financial Plans covering
respective Public Investment Program/Projects to the NPMC Secretariat
excluding internal administration support, and capital outlays to the
National PMC Secretariat through the NEDA-PMS not later than two weeks
after approval by DBM.
Specifically, DPWH and DOTC will provide the National PMC
Secretariat, through the NEDA-PMS, copies of the National Infrastructure
Program for the regions within two weeks after approval by the President.
-
The DBM will ensure
that the National Secretariat is provided with copies of all Advice of
Allotments issued, whether comprehensively released at the start of the
fiscal year or as directed by law as in the case of certain special
purpose funds which require the fulfillment of certain preconditions of
release, including issuance of Notice of Cash Allocation to implementors.
-
The National PMC
Secretariat will disseminate information on projects to be monitored by
the regional and provincial, city and municipal PMCs to the different RDCs.
The Regional PMCs shall be responsible for disseminating information on
projects to be monitored to the provincial, city, and municipal levels.
-
The project
implementors will undertake projects and prepare and submit status reports
of project implementation to the National PMC.
-
National PMC
Secretariat will assess agency reports and conduct project visits for
selected projects as may be identified based on established criteria.
-
National PMC
Secretariat will process reports of various implementing agencies, RDCs
and prepare QUARTERLY consolidated report on status of project
implementation.
-
The national PMC will
evaluate problems, provide/formulate recommendations and submit these to
the Office of the President/Cabinet for appropriate action or may initiate
problem-solving sessions with the Cabinet and the President.
-
National PMC
Secretariat will provide feedback to concerned implementers / RDCs / PMCs
/ LGUs / NGOs and other concerned agencies and follow up implementation of
remedial measures.
Regional Level
-
The RPMC, upon receipt
of information on projects to be monitored, will classify projects which
may be monitored, either thru desk monitoring or actual validation/ocular
inspection, at the provincial, city and municipal levels.
Information on projects to be monitored will come from the
following sources:
-
Monitoring Plan
prepared by the National PMC Secretariat;
-
Work and Financial
Plans/Initial Project Reports Submitted by the Regional Offices of
Regular Government Agencies;
-
Reports provided by
DBM Regional Offices, such as list of projects funded out of the General
Appropriations Act and/or the Infrastructure Program; and
-
Work programs for
locally-funded projects submitted by the Local Chief Executives.
-
The RPMC will prepare
the Work and Financial Plan to cover the activities of the regional PMCs
which shall be endorsed by the RDC Chairman to the DBM Regional Office as
basis for the allocation of funds for the operating requirements at the
regional level PMCs.
-
The RPMC Secretariat
will prepare the monitoring plan to be undertaken by the
regional/provincial, city, municipal PMCs which shall include, among
others, the list of projects and schedule of implementation based on the
submission of implementing agencies.
-
The RPMC Secretariat
will provide the NGOs with the Regional Monitoring Plan, and the
provincial/city/municipal PMCs and Chief Executives with information on
projects to be monitored at their level.
-
The RPMC will prepare
its monitoring work program for the calendar year.
-
The project
implementors will undertake projects and prepare and submit status reports
of project implementation to the RPMC.
-
NGOs (RPMC members or
other independent NGOs/POs and concerned citizens) will submit project
exception reports to the RPMC, copy furnished the implementors.
-
RPMC will assess NGO
and agency reports and conduct project visits for selected projects as may
be identified based on established criteria.
-
RPMC will process
reports of various implementing agencies, provincial PMCs and provide RDC
a consolidated report on status of project implementation.
-
RPMC will evaluate
problems and provide/formulate recommendations during its regular MONTHLY
or special meetings, and submit same to RDC for appropriate action.
-
RDC will assess reports
and take proper action (problem-solving, referral to other
agencies/councils/bodies).
-
RPMC will provide
feedback to concerned implementers / LGUs / NGOs and other concerned
agencies and follow up implementation of remedial measures.
-
RPMC will forward
status report on project implementation to the National PMC Secretariat
and other higher level bodies.
Provincial/City Levels
-
The Provincial/City PMC
Secretariat will include Provincial-/City-funded development projects (20%
of the IRA share) in the monitoring plan and provide copies to the NGOs.
The monitoring plan will contain information on projects to be implemented
at these levels.
-
The Provincial/City PMC
will prepare its monitoring work program for the calendar year.
-
Project implementors
will undertake projects and prepare and submit status reports on project
implementation to Provincial/City PMC.
-
NGOs (Provincial/City
PMC members or independent NGOs/PVOs and concerned citizens) will submit
project exception reports to the Provincial/City PMC, copy furnished the
project implementors.
-
Provincial/City PMC
will assess reports of implementers (agency or LGU) and NGOs, and conduct
project visits of projects as identified in the monitoring work program.
-
Provincial/City PMC
will process reports of various implementors and Municipal PMCs, and
provide Provincial Development Council with a consolidated report on
status of project implementation in the province.
-
Provincial/City PMC
will evaluate problems, recommend solutions during its regular or special
meetings, and refer these to the Provincial/City Development Council for
appropriate action. The Provincial/City PMC will hold regular QUARTERLY
meetings for this purpose or call special meetings as needed.
-
PDC/CDC will assess
reports and take proper action (problem-solving, referral to appropriate
agencies/council).
-
Implementors will take
remedial action on problems/issues encountered in project implementation.
If, after a reasonable period of time, no remedial measure/appropriate
action has been taken on the problems referred to the concerned agency/local
development council, the Provincial/City PMC will forward the issue to the
RDC.
-
Provincial/city PMC
will provide feedback to concerned implementers, LGUs, NGOs and other
concerned agencies and follow up implementation of remedial measures.
-
Provincial/City PMC
will forward consolidated status report on project implementation in the
province/city to the RPMC.
Municipal Level
-
The Municipal PMC
Secretariat will prepare its monitoring work program for the calendar
year.
-
Project implementors
will prepare and submit status reports on project implementation to the
municipal PMC.
-
NGOs (Municipal PMC
members and other independent NGOs/PVOs and concerned citizens) will
submit project exception reports to the municipal PMC, copy furnished the
implementors.
-
Municipal PMC will
assess NGO and agency/LGU reports, and conduct project visits for selected
projects as identified in the municipal monitoring work program.
-
Municipal PMC will
process reports of various implementors and provide the MDC a consolidated
report on the status of project implementation in the municipality.
-
Municipal PMC will
evaluate problems, formulate recommendations and refer these to the
Municipal development council for appropriate action. (It is suggested
that the municipal PMC will hold MONTHLY meetings for this purpose).
-
MDC will assess reports
and take proper action (problem-solving, referral to appropriate
agencies/council).
-
Implementors will take
remedial action on the problems/issues encountered in project
implementation. If after a reasonable period of time, no remedial
measures/appropriate actions have been taken on the problems referred to
the concerned agency/local development council, the Municipal PMC will
forward this issue to the PDC.
-
Municipal PMC will
provide feedback to concerned implementers, LGUs, NGOs and other concerned
agencies and follow up implementation of remedial measures.
-
Municipal PMC will
forward consolidated status report on project implementation in the
province/city to the Provincial PMC.
REPORTING
General Guidelines
To continuously monitor the funds earmarked for each project/activity in
relation to the agency/LGU accomplishment, the prescribed reports shall be
accomplished by the various implementors and monitoring units for capital
investment project/activity implemented. Option for the use of input forms
is available subject to conditions mentioned in Sec. 8.1.8 and 8.5. However,
output report forms for PMC are prescribed to facilitate consolidated of
report.
-
The implementors shall
accomplish the following input reports:
a.
Initial Project Reports-
containing basic information on projects to be implemented and activities to
be undertaken during the year. These include name of project, schedules,
financial and physical targets for each project/activity. These are
accomplished at the beginning of the year or before project implementation,
or when there are revisions in the project targets. (RPMES Form No. I-1 –
Monthly Physical and Financial Targets)
b.
Physical and Financial Accomplishment Report-
containing information on the status or progress of projects implemented or
activities undertaken. The cutoff date for reporting accomplishment shall be
in the 25th day of the month covering the period report.(RPMES Form No.I-2 –
Monthly Physical and Financial Report)
-
The following output
reports shall comprise the Consolidated monitoring Report of the Project
Monitoring Committees at various levels, which shall be submitted to the
Development Councils and the next higher level PMC:
a.
Report on the Status of Projects Encountering
Problems in Implementation (RPMES Form No. 0-1)
b.
Project Monitoring Report by Project, by Agency
and by Sector (RPMES Form Nos. 0-2, 0-3 and 0-4)
-
NGO/PO authorized
monitors are encouraged to submit the Project Exception Report for
outstanding performance by implementors. Likewise, they shall submit the
same for problems/issues encountered in project implementation.
-
The output reports of
the Provincial PMCs and progress reports of regional implementors shall be
processed into consolidated monitoring reports.
-
As a general rule, the
public shall be given access to RPMES reports and other documents.
-
The PMCs shall see to
it that members of Congress, among others, are regularly briefed on the
status of projects in their respective districts.
-
The suggested reporting
formats under the RPMES contain the minimum information requirements for
monitoring physical and financial performance of implementors. Thus, other
existing monitoring reports required of agencies/monitors by mother
agencies/other bodies may continue to be accomplished. However, it is
encouraged that RPMES formats be utilized and other information
desired/required of implementors be indicated as additional data in said
RPMS forms.
-
A reporting option is
available within RPMES which provides for the use of the projects
implementors’ existing reporting formats in submitting reports, provided
that all the information requirements of the RPMES can be satisfied, with
regards to coverage, content and frequency. The PMC concerned will decide
on the usefulness/acceptability of the existing agency reports fro RPMES
purposes. Moreover, it(PMC) will have to inform implementing agencies on
data gaps in their reports for subsequent reporting.
-
The existing reporting
requirements of the department of Public Works and Highways for
infrastructure projects requiring the S-curve (for projects above P3
million and gestation periods of more than one year), will continue to be
accomplished, provided that same be furnished the RPMC and other project
monitoring committees concerned. However, for projects costing below P3
million, the accomplishment of the prescribed RPMES forms is required.
Input Forms
To come up with desired outputs, the RPMES suggests three (3) input forms to
be accomplished by implementing agencies and NGOs. The formats of the input
forms are supple and contain only the minimum information required for
project monitoring and evaluation. These forms are used in monitoring and
reporting the status of project implementation for a single year.
-
Initial Project Reports
(PMC Forms I-1)- Input report containing basic information such as
name of project, total project cost, location, description of project and
monthly schedules of both financial and physical targets of each project.
This report will be accomplished at the beginning of the year or after
projects have been bidden/awarded, as the case may be, by the implementing
agencies/GOCCs/LGUs.
-
Physical and Financial
Accomplishment Report for Capital Investment Projects (PMC Form I-2)-
Input report on physical and financial accomplishment of the project,
including employment generated, problems encountered and measures
recommended to solve these problems. This will be accomplished by the
implementing agencies on a monthly basis. The cutoff date for reporting
project accomplishment shall be the 25th day of the month covering the
period of the report to allow for actual submission of report to regional
PMCs before the end of reporting month.
-
Pro |